Did landowner try to supply the opinion on Robin Hood tax?

Murad Ahmed, Technology Reporter & , : {}

The expel was familiar. It looked similar to the open were going to get one of those predictable, feel-good endings that they had come to design from the director. Then there was an astonishing twist.

When Richard Curtis, the British author of comfortable and hairy comedies such as Love Actually, launched a debate with a harder corner this week, the target was to win open await for a Robin Hood taxation on monetary institutions.

Now it has been claimed that a discontented worker at the investment bank Goldman Sachs one of the firms with the majority to lose from such a plan might have been at the back of an try to supply the open opinion asking people either they longed for the new levy.

The campaigns website facilities a video starring the actress Bill Nighy, a visit co-operator with Mr Curtis, who plays a promissory note senior manager apropos increasingly perplexed by questions on either such a taxation would work and how most it could raise. Following the film, a summary on the website asks people either they think the taxation a good idea.

Related LinksEU nations get at the back of super-tax on bonusesBrown sparks uninformed row over Tobin taxation for banks

As choosing by casting votes began on Wednesday, there was a flourishing roar for the yes opinion as thousands of viewers corroborated the campaign. But the check had to be dangling before long after 3.41pm when the "no" opinion went from 1,400 to some-more than 6,000 in five minutes.

Suspicious organisers dangling the list whilst they private what they saw as feign votes from the record. Their interpretation suggested that the poser no votes came from dual IP addresses one privately-owned and tough to trace, the other, it is claimed, purebred to a computer at Goldman Sachs.

The Robin Hood Tax debate is an try to benefit open await for the Tobin Tax, declared after the American economist who initial espoused the thought of levying big banks. Mr Curtis, the humerous entertainment bard at the back of the Vicar of Dibley and Blackadder, is the pushing force at the back of the bid to strap open annoy over bankers" bonuses and the bailout of monetary institutions.

Campaigners disagree that a 0.05 per cent levy on bank trades trimming from shares to unfamiliar sell and derivatives would emanate billions that could be outlayed on measures to quarrel general poverty, account open services and fight meridian change.

Goldman Sachs pronounced that it could not endorse or repudiate the claim of vote-rigging but combined that it was questioning the matter.

Internet experts pronounced that the movement was sabotage, as the law-breaker would have to emanate a special computer module in sequence to register so most votes in such a short space of time. They additionally pronounced it was possible, though unlikely, that the debate had depressed plant to an blow up hoax, as it is probable to facade the loyal IP residence and have it appear as though a hacker came from elsewhere.

A Robin Hood Tax Campaign orator said: Were gay with the accepting the offer has perceived in small over a day given we launched and the good that open await for a taxation on banks monetary exchange is creation people in the City of London lay up and notice.

With millions pang as a outcome of an mercantile predicament they did zero to cause, it will take some-more than a couple of indeterminate "no" votes on the website to criticise await for a little taxation on banks to account movement on meridian shift and plunge into misery at home and abroad.