Britain doesnt have the luxury of time when it comes to cutting the deficit

Published: 6:00AM GMT twenty-three February 2010

Comments 2 |

Randall interviewed David Cameron on topics together with slicing the deficit. Worryingly, so close to an election, Cameron had no thought what �72bn, or about 10pc, of annual spending accounted for by the Treasury as "other expenditure" unequivocally was.

In actuality it includes large range for cuts together with such vagaries as "recreation, enlightenment media and competition and spending nonetheless to be allocated".

Theres no stealing place for sleek politicians in this YouTube age Voters are giving up on Labour given it gave up on them MPs expenses: Our politicians are concluded - the everyones error but theirs Swine flu: GSK doesnt take the disinfectant Were in denial: fearful to face up to the genuine causes of retrogression

At slightest it did in 2005 when "other" was �49bn. It"s right away �72bn, twice the open sequence and reserve spending, but no longer tangible in the 2009 Budget.

This deceptive but expanding object is contributing to those horrible annual debt servicing totals that I referred to in Saturday"s column.

I"ve given had copiousness of feedback on these horrible numbers that show that the cost of servicing the debt will be �30.7bn this year, �44.4bn subsequent and up to �65bn in 2014-15.

To be clear, they describe to servicing the sum batch of superb supervision debt of �848bn and mount as a sheer sign as to because we don"t have the oppulance of time when it comes to slicing the annual deficit.